A: The human and environmental catastrophe in Japan has been difficult to ascertain since the first earthquake set off the horrific events there.
Due to a lack of information about the extent of the radioactive exposure, investors have been playing a guessing game since the earthquake on March 11.
Since Japan is such a high-tech center, investors were immediately concerned about how any troubles in Japan might affect tech stocks.In fact, the Nasdaq composite index has been lagging both the broader Dow Jones industrial average and Standard & Poor’s 500 not just since March 11, but all year.
At first, most of the concern over Japan’s high-tech infrastructure centered around computer memory chips and blank wafers used by other tech companies to build computer chips. Later, there were worries about disruptions from everything from auto parts to other electronic components made or designed by Japanese companies.
Currently, you’re seeing tech manufacturers checking their supply lines and making adjustments if needed. Dell said it’s not seeing any major disruption in the supply of parts it needs to make its computer products. Meanwhile, other alternative makers of specific parts are increasing their production trying to make up for any shortfalls or disruptions.
It’s looking, so far, that most high-tech companies have been able make manufacturing adjustments to handle the hit to the high tech supply chain.
With that said, investors shouldn’t ignore the fact that the tech heavy Nasdaq composite index continues to be a laggard. While the industry appears able to withstand the blow from Japan, there appear to be other factors slowing things down. Earlier in March, JMP Securities analyst Alex Gauna issued a practically unheard of downgrade to tech behemoth, Apple (AAPL).
Gauna reported seeing a slowdown in revenue at Foxconn, a large Chinese manufacturer that makes most of the iGadgets. When Gauna raised the concern, many investors began to question whether or not they’ve been too optimistic over the belief consumers seem to have a bottomless wallet when it comes to electronic gadgets.
So it seems that currently, the greatest risk to tech stocks isn’t the Japanese crisis, yet, but instead any slowdown in the hyperactive level of tech spending by consumers. But as news comes out of Japan, investors will need to reassess their assumptions.
Who are the Libyan rebels? U.S. tries to figure out
By Laura Rozen"He was a very nice guy," Libyan businessman Ibrahim Ismail told Newsweek of the initially quite anxious American pilot. "He came to free the Libyan people." Rebel officials dispatched a doctor to attend to the pilot and presented him with a bouquet of flowers, according to Newsweek.
But the U.S. government, now engaged in a fourth day of air strikes against Libyan regime military targets, does not know very much about the rebels who now see it as a friendly ally in their fight to overthrow Muammar Gadhafi.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton held a 45-minute, closed-door meeting with Mahmoud Jibril, a leader of the newly formed Libyan opposition Interim National Council in a luxury Paris hotel earlier this month. But in a clear signal of America's wariness about all the unknowns, Clinton gave no public statement after their meeting and did not appear in photographs with the rebel leader. (By contrast, a week earlier French President Nicholas Sarkozy bestowed formal diplomatic recognition on the Council and was photographed shaking hands with its emissaries Jibril and Ali Essawi on the steps of the Elysee Palace.)
Middle East policy watchers note a glaring disconnect between the buoyant expectations of some rebel supporters that the international military coalition will provide direct air support for their armed struggle, and the insistence of U.S. military commanders that their mandate allows for no such thing.
The coalition mission doesn't include protecting forces engaged in combat against Libyan leader Muammar Gadhafi's forces, Gen. Carter Ham, the commander of U.S. Africa Command, told reporters Monday. His mission, Ham said, is narrowly confined to preventing Gadhafi forces from attacking civilians, getting Gadhafi's forces to pull back from rebel-held towns, and allowing civilians humanitarian access to food, water, and electricity/gas supplies, Ham said.
So who are the Libyan rebels with whom we now seem (for better or for worse) to be joined with in a shared fight against Gadhafi?
One view has it that the Libyan rebels are basically peaceful protesters who found their demonstrations against Gadhafi met with bullets and had no choice but to resort to violence.
"The protesters are nice, sincere people who want a better future for Libya," Human Rights Watch Emergencies Director Peter Bouckaert told South Africa's Business Day. "But their strength is also their weakness: they aren't hardened fighters, so no one knows what the end game will be."
"This is not really a civil war between two equal powers--it started as a peaceful protest movement and was met with bullets," Bouckaert continued. "Now you have a situation where you have a professional and heavily equipped army fighting a disorganized and inexperienced bunch of rebels who stand little chance against them."
Still, the rebels are largely unknown to the American government, despite initial tentative meetings such as Clinton's and some meetings held by U.S. Ambassador to Libya Gene Cretz with opposition representatives. (Cretz is now working out of the State Department, as the United States has withdrawn its diplomatic presence.) Last week, President Barack Obama appointed an American diplomat, Chris Stevens, to be the U.S. liaison to the Libyan opposition.
"We don't have the comfort level with the rebels," said the National Security Network's Joel Rubin, a former State Department official. "We certainly know some things about them, had meetings. It's not as if there's complete blindness. But I don't think at this stage the comfort level is there for that kind of close coordination."
But the Libyan rebels seem to have found western consultants who have offered advice on reassuring buzzwords the West would like to hear. On Tuesday, the Interim National Council issued just such a soothing statement from their rebel stronghold of Benghazi.
"The Interim National Council is committed to the ultimate goal of the revolution which is to build a democratic civil state, based on the rule of law, respect for human rights including ... equal rights and duties for all citizens, ... equality between men and women, " the Council said in their statement.
The Council also "reaffirms that Libya's foreign policy will be based on mutual respect and ... respect [for] international law and international humanitarian law," the group said.
(Photo, top: Libyan rebels on the road between Benghazi and Ajdabiyah: Suhaib Salem/Reuters. Photo, middle: France's President Nicolas Sarkozy shakes hands with Libyan Interim National Council emissaries Mahmoud Jibril (R) and Ali Essawi after a meeting at the Elysee Palace in Paris March 10, 2011: Gonzalo Fuentes/Reuters)